Temporary supervision could give off a false sense of security. Fortunately though, permanent supervision is never as permanent as it seems, nor need it be. Take the matter of incarceration. The first or second-time offender has no choice but to submit himself to correction. But if it is only for a short period, who is to say that he will not learn his lesson or have his delinquent behavior corrected.
It is of course, still quite complex when it comes to adult care services massachusetts admissions requirements and subsequent caregiving and (medical) supervisory work that must follow. But perhaps this form of incarceration always has a better chance of succeeding owing to the fact that it is all as a result of privately funded initiatives. Ask any patient who has had the privilege or good fortune of private medical care and they will all say similar things.
Private care is just so much better than what is being given, if it’s being given at all, by the public or government-run alternatives. You wonder sometimes why the powers that be simply cannot get on with delivering the services that are due to the public, doesn’t matter whether they are obedient tax payers or not, doesn’t matter whether they are law-abiding citizens or not. Does not even matter whether they voted last time or not.
Because let’s just assume that if they did not, who is to say that they did not act in accordance with their conscience after giving the matter weeks and months of serious deliberation. The matter of adult care does not leave much room for deciding whether or not, or either or. The work just has to be done. People are morally committed to this initiative.